Choose Your Words Carefully — Rev. David J. Schreffler

 

image

August 25, 2015

“From there he set out and went away to the region of Tyre. He entered a house and did not want anyone to know he was there. Yet he could not escape notice, but a woman whose little daughter had an unclean spirit immediately heard about him, and she came and bowed down at his feet. Now the woman was a Gentile, of Syrophoenician origin. She begged him to cast the demon out of her daughter. He said to her, “Let the children be fed first, for it is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.” But she answered him, “Sir, even the dogs under the table eat the children’s crumbs.” Then he said to her, “For saying that, you may go—the demon has left your daughter.” So she went home, found the child lying on the bed, and the demon gone.” Mark 7:24 – 30

The word dog was in fact sometimes a Jewish term of contempt for the Gentiles. No matter how you look at it, the term dog is an insult. How, then, are we to explain Jesus’ use of it here? He did not use the usual word; He used a diminutive word which described, not the wild dogs of the streets, but the little pet lap-dogs of the house. In Greek diminutives are characteristically affectionate. Jesus took the sting out of the word. Without a doubt his tone of voice makes all the difference. We can call a man “an old rascal” in a voice of contempt or a voice of affection. Jesus’ tone took all the poison out of the word.” William Barclay (1907 – 1978) The Daily Study Bible: The Gospel of Mark, “For All The Saints” volume II (p. 402-403)

How often we come to realize that we have used a word that has offended someone, when we did not intend it to be understood in that way. I think this happens more and more in our society where people have become “hyper-sensitive” to the use of words. Not that long ago President Obama used the “N” word in an interview — this is a word that is highly offensive to most people, yet he chose to use it for its impact in that situation and that interview. Jesus did the same when he called the woman (who was a Gentile) a “dog”. The word could have been offensive to the woman, but she understood the context and the purpose of Jesus’ word choice. Her quick comeback and persistence in the face of the situation showed Jesus that the word did not matter — what mattered was her need for Jesus to heal her daughter.

Just recently, Donald Trump, a republican presidential front-runner (for the time being) has received a lot of attention because he stated that he did not believe that Senator John McCain was a war hero. What ever the reason for his remarks, Donald Trump understands how words can get the attention of people, voters, and the media. As Christians we need to seek ways that we can use words that bring healing to relationships, that bridge social and racial chasms, and that build up the body of Christ.

Pastor Dave

“Fear and Love G*d — Rev. David J. Schreffler

 

image

August 24, 2015

“He said to them, “Isaiah prophesied rightly about you hypocrites, as it is written, ‘This people honors me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching human precepts as doctrines.’ You abandon the commandment of God and hold to human tradition.” Mark 7:6-8

In his explanation of the commandments, Luther begins every one with these words, “We should fear and love G*d and…” It is perhaps well known that there are some Christians today who maintain that Luther made a mistake in this. They strike out the “fear” and say that we should love G*d, nothing more. But when the people of our superficial generation have read the Bible as thoroughly as Luther did, they will see that Luther was right also in this. He has seen that there is something about love which is to be feared. He has seen that there is something about grace which is dangerous. He has seen the risk connected with grace….” “Under His Wings”,  Ole Hallesby (1879 – 1961) “For All The Saints” volume II, (p. 398)

There are denominations that focus on Hell and the fear of G*d, and there are those that focus on Grace and the unlimited love of G*d. And then there are those that are all over the spectrum between love and fear.

Which is better, to build a relationship on love, or to build a relationship on fear? That depends, I guess, on how important the relationship is to the person — and how you choose to define the word “fear”. If fear is defined as “to be afraid of”, then a relationship built on this kind of fear is one sided and controlling. But, if fear is defined as “awe” or “reverence and respect”, then the relationship is one of respect, and obedience that is based on love.

I guess we could have a relationship with G*d where we are always afraid, always concerned with whether we have done enough to earn our righteousness, but to me that relationship is one-sided and manipulative. But, as Martin Luther says, if we “fear and love G*d…” where fear is one of awe and respect, then we are truly building a relationship based on Grace and love, first, followed closely by respect — which leads to a life of obedience which understands that we will not always succeed in doing what we should, or loving like we should, but because of Grace, G*d still loves us unconditionally.

Pastor Dave